<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Subjective Objectivism &#187; Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/tag/religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com</link>
	<description>Pseudo Neo Objectivist Observations of Life, the Universe, and Everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Penn on Theism, Atheism and Agnosticism.</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/penn-on-theism-atheism-and-agnosticism/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/penn-on-theism-atheism-and-agnosticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanaticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jillette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn Jillette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video is a prime example of what I consider a positive (or at least Neutral) attitude about Theism, Atheism and Agnosticism. Unlike many of the folks who feel the need to rant and rave about the evils of one or the other, Penn Jillette has managed to distill the issue into simple, practical, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/penn-on-theism-atheism-and-agnosticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Battle of Good and Evil&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/the-battle-of-good-and-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/the-battle-of-good-and-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zealotry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I read (watched actually) the 666th post on the blog (or yolog) on the Blog of the Angry Aussie. For his 666th post, he decided to talk about the concepts of good and evil. Well worth listening to what he said if you have a few minutes, because he makes some excellent points.
If I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/the-battle-of-good-and-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary Clergymen</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/contrary-clergymen/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/contrary-clergymen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/2007/10/14/contrary-clergymen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, I am fully aware that priests are human beings, just like everyone else. But I&#8217;d hope that, once you became a man/woman of the cloth, you would at least try to leave behind the things that us regular folks are prone to do. But given some of the news I&#8217;ve been reading lately, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/contrary-clergymen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creationist vs. Scientist&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/creationist-vs-scientist/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/creationist-vs-scientist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unorthodox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/2007/10/08/creationist-vs-scientist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into a very interesting post about Billy Grahams stance on creationism and science. I won&#8217;t repeat the entire text because the salient parts are included the the blog at the link below, but I found it interesting that we both have a similar tack on creation, science and man. I am, as I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/creationist-vs-scientist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Regulates Reincarnation&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/china-regulates-reincarnation/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/china-regulates-reincarnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reincarnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/2007/08/03/china-regulates-reincarnation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is an excerpt from a rather unusual article:
Tibetan living Buddhas are no longer allowed to be reincarnated without permission from the atheist Chinese government, state media reported Friday.
The new rules are &#8220;an important move to institutionalise the management of reincarnation of living Buddhas,&#8221; the Xinhua news agency said.
According to the regulations, which take [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/china-regulates-reincarnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are religions really universal?</title>
		<link>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/do-religions-really-have-universal-cores/</link>
		<comments>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/do-religions-really-have-universal-cores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phyreblade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/2007/07/17/do-religions-really-have-universal-cores/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an interesting piece on the unfortunate verdict of a British High Court to disallow a young teenager the freedom to wear her &#8220;Purity Ring&#8221; to school:
A teen-ager whose teachers had stopped her wearing a &#8220;purity ring&#8221; at school to symbolize her commitment to virginity lost a High Court fight against the ban Monday. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://subjectiveobjectivism.com/do-religions-really-have-universal-cores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
